Sudha Omu Harikantra vs Jayashree Pandu Harikantra — 92/2024

Case Summary: O.S. No. 92/2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction with costs on June 10, 2024. Key Facts: Plaintiff Sudha Omu Harikantra sought to restrain Defendant No. 11 (Chandrakant Teela Harikantra) from constructing on jointly-owned property, claiming he is a stranger with no rights. Defendant No. 11 argued he owns separate land (CTS No. 12029, 27.88 sq.m) within the suit property with ancestral rights dating to 1961 court judgment, and is merely renovating his dilapidated ancestral house, not encroaching on plaintiff's share. Court's Decision: The court found defendant No. 11 has legitimate right, title, and interest in his ancestral portion. The plaintiff's contradictory claims (denying defendant any rights yet allowing construction after partition) lacked credibility. No prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable harm favoring the plaintiff was established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.