Sudha Omu Harikantra vs Jayashree Pandu Harikantra — 92/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK030008782024
Filing Number
93/2024
Filing Date
30-May-2024
Registration No
92/2024
Registration Date
30-May-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC II, KARWAR
Judge
1013-Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sudha Omu Harikantra
Adv. RENUKA PRASAD BHARADWAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayashree Pandu Harikantra
-
2.Aravind Pandu Harikantra
-
3.Girija Pandu Harikantra,
-
4.Gopi Yeshwant Harikantra,
-
5.Deepak Yeshwant Harikantra
-
6.Sudheer Yashwant Harikantra
-
7.Tejashree Ganapati Harikantra
-
8.Vinod Yeshwant Harikantra
-
9.Pratima Nagaraj Durgekar
-
10.Rama Taku Harikantra
-
11.Chandrakant Teela Harikantra
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
13-Mar-2026
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
22-Jan-2026
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
03-Jan-2026
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
10-Dec-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
12-Nov-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
09-Oct-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
10-Sep-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
18-Aug-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
22-Jul-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
02-Jul-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
16-Apr-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
19-Mar-2025
Issues
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
01-Feb-2025
Await
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
17-Dec-2024
Await
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
25-Oct-2024
Await
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
10-Sep-2024
Await
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
19-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
29-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
10-Jun-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 92/2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction with costs on June 10, 2024. Key Facts: Plaintiff Sudha Omu Harikantra sought to restrain Defendant No. 11 (Chandrakant Teela Harikantra) from constructing on jointly-owned property, claiming he is a stranger with no rights. Defendant No. 11 argued he owns separate land (CTS No. 12029, 27.88 sq.m) within the suit property with ancestral rights dating to 1961 court judgment, and is merely renovating his dilapidated ancestral house, not encroaching on plaintiff's share. Court's Decision: The court found defendant No. 11 has legitimate right, title, and interest in his ancestral portion. The plaintiff's contradictory claims (denying defendant any rights yet allowing construction after partition) lacked credibility. No prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable harm favoring the plaintiff was established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
07-Jun-2024
Order On I.A.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
05-Jun-2024
Order On I.A.
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
01-Jun-2024
Notice
Addl.civil Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
31-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2024
Case Summary: O.S. No. 92/2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction with costs on June 10, 2024. Key Facts: Plaintiff Sudha Omu Harikantra sought to restrain Defendant No. 11 (Chandrakant Teela Harikantra) from constructing on jointly-owned property, claiming he is a stranger with no rights. Defendant No. 11 argued he owns separate land (CTS No. 12029, 27.88 sq.m) within the suit property with ancestral rights dating to 1961 court judgment, and is merely renovating his dilapidated ancestral house, not encroaching on plaintiff's share. Court's Decision: The court found defendant No. 11 has legitimate right, title, and interest in his ancestral portion. The plaintiff's contradictory claims (denying defendant any rights yet allowing construction after partition) lacked credibility. No prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable harm favoring the plaintiff was established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts