Ramesh B.H.T Age 39 years, R/o NSRY , Araga, Karwar. vs Admiral Superintednent of Yard Naval Ship Repair Yard, Karwar. — 70/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/S 105. Status: Await. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK030007502023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
70/2023
Filing Date
02-05-2023
Registration No
70/2023
Registration Date
02-05-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC II, KARWAR
Judge
1013-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC II COURT, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh B.H.T Age 39 years, R/o NSRY , Araga, Karwar.
Adv. In person by name Ramesh B.H.T
Respondent(s)
Admiral Superintednent of Yard Naval Ship Repair Yard, Karwar.
The Joint Director of Factories Department of Factories, R/o Hubli.
Hearing History
Judge: 1013-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC II COURT, KARWAR
Await
OBJECTIONS
OBJECTIONS
Notice to Respondent
Restored
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Await |
| 28-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 13-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 09-02-2026 | Notice to Respondent |
| 09-02-2026 | Restored |
Interim Orders
Case 70/2023 Summary: Ramesh B.H.T filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 105 of the Factories Act seeking to quash an order dated 21.05.2022 and requesting directions to provide him Rank and Status of a Safety Officer with retrospective service benefits. The Additional JMFC, Karwar dismissed the petition, holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to grant such relief as it was beyond the powers of a JMFC, which is only empowered to try offences under the Factories Act, not issue administrative directions. The court ruled the reliefs sought fall exclusively under the High Court's writ jurisdiction and disposed of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 70/2023 Summary: Ramesh B.H.T filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 105 of the Factories Act seeking to quash an order dated 21.05.2022 and requesting directions to provide him Rank and Status of a Safety Officer with retrospective service benefits. The Additional JMFC, Karwar dismissed the petition, holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to grant such relief as it was beyond the powers of a JMFC, which is only empowered to try offences under the Factories Act, not issue administrative directions. The court ruled the reliefs sought fall exclusively under the High Court's writ jurisdiction and disposed of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts