Ramesh Chandru Gouda vs Rajendra Vasant Mane — 465/2024
Case under U/s 22 of W.c Act 1923 R/w Rule 20 of W.c Rule 1966 Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUK020039362024
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
90/2024
Filing Date
13-11-2024
Registration No
465/2024
Registration Date
14-11-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Chandru Gouda
Adv. RAMANATH VAMAN BHAT
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Vasant Mane
SBI General Insurance Company Ltd., Hubli
Hearing History
Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 15-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 08-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MVC 465/2024 Case: Ramesh Chandru Gouda v. Rajendra Vasant Mane and SBI General Insurance Company Ltd., Hubli Outcome: Case adjourned for further proceedings. The court found the respondent's witness testimony unreliable and raised serious concerns about the disability certificate (partial disability affidavit) issued by the hospital. The court noted inconsistencies in the medical evidence and witness statements, and directed that the case continue with proper examination of documents and witnesses. The court rejected claims made by the respondent's representative regarding the petitioner's injury severity and disability assessment, finding insufficient grounds to support the affidavit as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MVC 465/2024 Case: Ramesh Chandru Gouda v. Rajendra Vasant Mane and SBI General Insurance Company Ltd., Hubli Outcome: Case adjourned for further proceedings. The court found the respondent's witness testimony unreliable and raised serious concerns about the disability certificate (partial disability affidavit) issued by the hospital. The court noted inconsistencies in the medical evidence and witness statements, and directed that the case continue with proper examination of documents and witnesses. The court rejected claims made by the respondent's representative regarding the petitioner's injury severity and disability assessment, finding insufficient grounds to support the affidavit as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts