Smt Savita Shivanand Naik Yane Nish Nilesh Naik Household R/o Komarpanthwada Sayikatta Kodibag Karw vs Smt Ujwala D/o Kashinath Pednekar Yane Ujwala W/o Prashanth Raikar Business R/o Shivkunja Sonarwada Advocate - SSK — 2289/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 16th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK020033902024
Filing Number
2289/2024
Filing Date
30-05-2024
Registration No
2289/2024
Registration Date
30-05-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Savita Shivanand Naik Yane Nish Nilesh Naik Household R/o Komarpanthwada Sayikatta Kodibag Karw
Adv. RENUKA PRASAD BHARADWAJ
Respondent(s)
Smt Ujwala D/o Kashinath Pednekar Yane Ujwala W/o Prashanth Raikar Business R/o Shivkunja Sonarwada Advocate - SSK
Hearing History
Judge: 594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused, Smt. Ujwala Pednekar, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 10,00,000 due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant proved the existence of a legally recoverable debt and that the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation to the complainant with two years imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court convicted the accused, Smt. Ujwala Pednekar, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 10,00,000 due to insufficient funds. The court found that the complainant proved the existence of a legally recoverable debt and that the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation to the complainant with two years imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts