THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs GREGORY GILBERT MATHIAS — 2391/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),229(2),340(2),237,61,3(5),238. Status: AWAIT ORDERS. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK020028452025

AWAIT ORDERS

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

31-10-2025

Filing Number

2391/2025

Filing Date

31-10-2025

Registration No

2391/2025

Registration Date

31-10-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR

Judge

520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

FIR Details

FIR Number

0045

Police Station

KARWAR TOWN PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),229(2),340(2),237,61,3(5),238

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Respondent(s)

GREGORY GILBERT MATHIAS

Raju Rama Naik

Adv. null

Dayananda Shrinivas Shetty

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

03-06-2026

AWAIT ORDERS

20-05-2026

AWAIT ORDERS

06-05-2026

AWAIT ORDERS

22-04-2026

AWAIT ORDERS

08-04-2026

FOR STEPS

Interim Orders

01-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: C.C. No. 2391/2025 Outcome: Bail Denied Accused Gregory Gilbert's bail application under Section 480 of B.N.S.S. was rejected by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Karwar on April 1, 2026. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-accused, created fraudulent Aadhaar cards and presented them to multiple courts as surety documents, constituting fraud against the court system. Despite the charge sheet being filed, the court determined the gravity of the non-bailable offences (punishable up to 7 years imprisonment) and risk of witness tampering warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 2391/2025 Outcome: Bail Denied Accused Gregory Gilbert's bail application under Section 480 of B.N.S.S. was rejected by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Karwar on April 1, 2026. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused, along with co-accused, created fraudulent Aadhaar cards and presented them to multiple courts as surety documents, constituting fraud against the court system. Despite the charge sheet being filed, the court determined the gravity of the non-bailable offences (punishable up to 7 years imprisonment) and risk of witness tampering warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case