Ashraya Co.operative Credit Society Ltd., Sadashivgad Karwar vs Pavankumar Govind Gosavi — 2325/2025
Case under U/s 426 of Kar Edu Act 1983 as Amended Uptodate and U/s 117 of Ipc Section U/s200S138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK020027402025
Filing Number
2325/2025
Filing Date
11-06-2024
Registration No
2325/2025
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashraya Co.operative Credit Society Ltd., Sadashivgad Karwar
Adv. PRADEEP BABU TANDEL
Respondent(s)
Pavankumar Govind Gosavi
Hearing History
Judge: 594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 07-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ashraya Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Pavankumar Govind Gosavi (2325/2025) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove the legally enforceable debt. The court identified critical discrepancies in the loan account statement (Ex.P.15), which showed an outstanding balance of Rs.1,19,956/- rather than the Rs.1,66,735/- claimed in the dishonored cheque, and determined the complainant produced inadequate documentary evidence lacking proper certification and authentication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ashraya Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. Pavankumar Govind Gosavi (2325/2025) The court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the complainant failed to prove the legally enforceable debt. The court identified critical discrepancies in the loan account statement (Ex.P.15), which showed an outstanding balance of Rs.1,19,956/- rather than the Rs.1,66,735/- claimed in the dishonored cheque, and determined the complainant produced inadequate documentary evidence lacking proper certification and authentication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts