Akshaya Co.operative Credit Society Ltd., R/by its Branch Manager, Karwar vs Mrs. Sheetal W/o. Jaiprakash Maitri, — 1818/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK020025962024

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

1818/2024

Filing Date

02-09-2024

Registration No

1818/2024

Registration Date

02-09-2024

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR

Judge

520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Akshaya Co.operative Credit Society Ltd., R/by its Branch Manager, Karwar

Adv. G.V.NAIK

Respondent(s)

Mrs. Sheetal W/o. Jaiprakash Maitri,

Hearing History

Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

13-03-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

06-03-2026

Concilliation

23-02-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

17-02-2026

NBW to Accused

07-02-2026

NBW to Accused

Interim Orders

18-09-2025
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No: C.C. 1818/2024 Outcome: The court found the respondent (A.R.P., a teacher) liable in this civil dispute involving loan and cheque issues. The court held that the respondent did not provide valid security or collateral for the loan, failed to produce necessary business documents, and concealed material facts regarding loan repayment statements between November 2022 and May 2024. The court determined that the respondent issued a cheque without authorization to pay back Rs. 1,12,000 and that the respondent filed a false case with false witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No: C.C. 1818/2024 Outcome: The court found the respondent (A.R.P., a teacher) liable in this civil dispute involving loan and cheque issues. The court held that the respondent did not provide valid security or collateral for the loan, failed to produce necessary business documents, and concealed material facts regarding loan repayment statements between November 2022 and May 2024. The court determined that the respondent issued a cheque without authorization to pay back Rs. 1,12,000 and that the respondent filed a false case with false witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case