Prasad Shrikant Kamat vs Divya Pramod Gaonkar — 1934/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/s.138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK020022682025
Filing Number
1934/2025
Filing Date
24-Sep-2024
Registration No
1934/2025
Registration Date
24-Sep-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
594-Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prasad Shrikant Kamat
Adv. M B HARIKANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.Divya Pramod Gaonkar
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
05-May-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
21-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case 1934/2025 Summary: The case between Prasad Shrikant Kamat (petitioner) and Divya Pramod Gaonkar (respondent) concerns a monetary dispute. The respondent claims she borrowed ₹8,00,000 from the petitioner on 10-09-2022 and provided two cheques as security, subsequently repaying the amount through cheques and RTGS transfers (₹1,00,000 on 09-03-2023, ₹1,00,000 on 19-05-2023, and ₹6,80,000 on 19-06-2023). The respondent contends all money has been repaid and requests dismissal of the case. The court adjourned the matter to allow the petitioner's counsel time to file a counter-reply, with witness testimony to be recorded according to applicable procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
10-Feb-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
04-Feb-2026
Orders
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Objection
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
09-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
23-Dec-2025
Orders
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
20-Dec-2025
Objection
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
15-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
27-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
06-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar
-
02-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1934/2025
Case 1934/2025 Summary: The case between Prasad Shrikant Kamat (petitioner) and Divya Pramod Gaonkar (respondent) concerns a monetary dispute. The respondent claims she borrowed ₹8,00,000 from the petitioner on 10-09-2022 and provided two cheques as security, subsequently repaying the amount through cheques and RTGS transfers (₹1,00,000 on 09-03-2023, ₹1,00,000 on 19-05-2023, and ₹6,80,000 on 19-06-2023). The respondent contends all money has been repaid and requests dismissal of the case. The court adjourned the matter to allow the petitioner's counsel time to file a counter-reply, with witness testimony to be recorded according to applicable procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts