Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai vs Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devali — 1930/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 04th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK020022612025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1930/2025

Filing Date

16-04-2025

Registration No

1930/2025

Registration Date

16-04-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR

Judge

594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR

Decision Date

04th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai

Adv. U N Naik

Respondent(s)

Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devali

Hearing History

Judge: 594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR

04-06-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

25-04-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

09-04-2026

EVIDENCE

02-04-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

04-06-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: C.C.No. 1930/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Karwar, Uttara Kannada Judgment Date: 4 June 2026 Parties: Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai (Complainant) v. Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devli (Accused) Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,25,000 (the cheque amount), with the entire fine payable to the complainant as compensation. In default of payment, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Key Facts The complainant lent a total of Rs. 1,25,000 to the accused in multiple installments between May 2023 and March 2024. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,25,000 dated 26 September 2024, which was dishonoured on 30 September 2024 for insufficient funds. Despite service of a legal notice on 25 October 2024, the accused neither paid the amount nor replied. Reasoning The court found that the complainant satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and drew statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 in her favour. The accused failed to adduce any credible evidence to rebut these presumptions, merely suggesting the cheque was given as security—a claim categorically denied by the complainant and unsupported by evidence. The accused neither testified in defence nor explained her position during Section 313 questioning, substantially weakening her case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Deposition
09-04-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No. 1930/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Karwar, Uttara Kannada Judgment Date: 4 June 2026 Parties: Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai (Complainant) v. Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devli (Accused) Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,25,000 (the cheque amount), with the entire fine payable to the complainant as compensation. In default of payment, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Key Facts The complainant lent a total of Rs. 1,25,000 to the accused in multiple installments between May 2023 and March 2024. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,25,000 dated 26 September 2024, which was dishonoured on 30 September 2024 for insufficient funds. Despite service of a legal notice on 25 October 2024, the accused neither paid the amount nor replied. Reasoning The court found that the complainant satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and drew statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 in her favour. The accused failed to adduce any credible evidence to rebut these presumptions, merely suggesting the cheque was given as security—a claim categorically denied by the complainant and unsupported by evidence. The accused neither testified in defence nor explained her position during Section 313 questioning, substantially weakening her case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case