Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai vs Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devali — 1930/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK020022612025

Filing Number

1930/2025

Filing Date

16-Apr-2025

Registration No

1930/2025

Registration Date

16-Apr-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR

Judge

594-Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai

    Adv. U N Naik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.No. 1930/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Karwar, Uttara Kannada Judgment Date: 4 June 2026 Parties: Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai (Complainant) v. Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devli (Accused) Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,25,000 (the cheque amount), with the entire fine payable to the complainant as compensation. In default of payment, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Key Facts The complainant lent a total of Rs. 1,25,000 to the accused in multiple installments between May 2023 and March 2024. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,25,000 dated 26 September 2024, which was dishonoured on 30 September 2024 for insufficient funds. Despite service of a legal notice on 25 October 2024, the accused neither paid the amount nor replied. Reasoning The court found that the complainant satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and drew statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 in her favour. The accused failed to adduce any credible evidence to rebut these presumptions, merely suggesting the cheque was given as security—a claim categorically denied by the complainant and unsupported by evidence. The accused neither testified in defence nor explained her position during Section 313 questioning, substantially weakening her case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  13. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  15. 07-Feb-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  17. 04-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  18. 23-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  19. 06-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  20. 19-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Addl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Karwar

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 16-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1930/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No. 1930/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Karwar, Uttara Kannada Judgment Date: 4 June 2026 Parties: Smt. Laksha Vinay Desai (Complainant) v. Smt. Shobha W/o Manjunath Devli (Accused) Decision The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,25,000 (the cheque amount), with the entire fine payable to the complainant as compensation. In default of payment, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Key Facts The complainant lent a total of Rs. 1,25,000 to the accused in multiple installments between May 2023 and March 2024. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,25,000 dated 26 September 2024, which was dishonoured on 30 September 2024 for insufficient funds. Despite service of a legal notice on 25 October 2024, the accused neither paid the amount nor replied. Reasoning The court found that the complainant satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and drew statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 in her favour. The accused failed to adduce any credible evidence to rebut these presumptions, merely suggesting the cheque was given as security—a claim categorically denied by the complainant and unsupported by evidence. The accused neither testified in defence nor explained her position during Section 313 questioning, substantially weakening her case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case