Arup Datta Agranayak vs Snehal Ritesh Badkar — 1929/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 13th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK020022602025
Filing Number
1929/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
1929/2025
Registration Date
16-04-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arup Datta Agranayak
Adv. Anuj A Agranayak
Respondent(s)
Snehal Ritesh Badkar
Hearing History
Judge: 594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 1929/2025 Court Decision: CONVICTION Arup Datta Agranayak (complainant) successfully prosecuted Snehal Ritesh Badkar (accused) for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 80,000 to repay a personal loan but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal demand notice, she failed to pay. The court found the accused guilty, sentencing her to pay a fine of Rs. 80,000 (with six-month imprisonment as default) and ordering the entire fine amount paid as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 1929/2025 Court Decision: CONVICTION Arup Datta Agranayak (complainant) successfully prosecuted Snehal Ritesh Badkar (accused) for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 80,000 to repay a personal loan but it bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal demand notice, she failed to pay. The court found the accused guilty, sentencing her to pay a fine of Rs. 80,000 (with six-month imprisonment as default) and ordering the entire fine amount paid as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts