Shashikala yane Smita Subhash Revankar, vs The President, St. Micle, Mother, Superior, Convent School, Karwar. — 33/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,OrderVII,rule1,3,5and7. Status: ADDL.W/S. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK020022072022
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
33/2022
Filing Date
03-11-2022
Registration No
33/2022
Registration Date
03-11-2022
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shashikala yane Smita Subhash Revankar,
Adv. NAGESH MANJA MADIWAL
Apa yane Chandrahas Pandurang Anvekar,
Kamalax Pandurang Anvekar,
Seema D/o. Shripad Anvekar,
Shyam Shripad Anvekar,
Respondent(s)
The President, St. Micle, Mother, Superior, Convent School, Karwar.
The Head Mistress, St. Micle, Mother, Superior, Convent School, Karwar.
Hearing History
Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
ADDL.W/S
ADDL.W/S
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | ADDL.W/S |
| 30-04-2026 | ADDL.W/S |
| 22-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 10-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 08-04-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.33/2022 The court partly allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint with a cost of Rs.300/-. The plaintiffs sought to add a declaration of title relief to their suit for recovery of possession of properties allegedly purchased by their grandfather in 1935 and given to the defendants (a convent school) for use as a playground on the condition of return when needed. The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real questions in controversy, as the defendants claimed adverse possession and denied the plaintiffs' title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.33/2022 The court partly allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint with a cost of Rs.300/-. The plaintiffs sought to add a declaration of title relief to their suit for recovery of possession of properties allegedly purchased by their grandfather in 1935 and given to the defendants (a convent school) for use as a playground on the condition of return when needed. The court found the amendment necessary to determine the real questions in controversy, as the defendants claimed adverse possession and denied the plaintiffs' title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts