St. Milagres Credit Souhardha Co.op. Limited Majali Branch Karwar R/by Mr.Nitesh T.K. vs Premanand Duga Ulvekar — 1435/2025
Case under U/s 426 of Kar Edu Act 1983 as Amended Uptodate and U/s 117 of Ipc Section U/s.138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK020017302025
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
1435/2025
Filing Date
20-09-2024
Registration No
1435/2025
Registration Date
20-09-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
St. Milagres Credit Souhardha Co.op. Limited Majali Branch Karwar R/by Mr.Nitesh T.K.
Adv. R V BHAT
Respondent(s)
Premanand Duga Ulvekar
Hearing History
Judge: 594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 1435/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge and District Court, Karwar Date: 19-02-2026 The court heard the affidavit evidence of witness Nitesh Kotarkar (age 27, Officer at St. Milagris Sahakari Credit Co-operative, Karwar) and admitted 15 documentary exhibits including a cheque for ₹1,04,974, cheque return memo, loan agreement, hypothecation agreement, and account statements. The respondent's counsel's application under Section 145(2) of the NI Act was allowed, and the case was adjourned to allow the respondent time to file a reply and cross-examination of the witness as per legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 1435/2025 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge and District Court, Karwar Date: 19-02-2026 The court heard the affidavit evidence of witness Nitesh Kotarkar (age 27, Officer at St. Milagris Sahakari Credit Co-operative, Karwar) and admitted 15 documentary exhibits including a cheque for ₹1,04,974, cheque return memo, loan agreement, hypothecation agreement, and account statements. The respondent's counsel's application under Section 145(2) of the NI Act was allowed, and the case was adjourned to allow the respondent time to file a reply and cross-examination of the witness as per legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts