Yashodha W/o. Shekhar Harikantra vs Suvidha Karapurkar — 263/2024

Case under U/s 22 of W.c Act 1923 R/w Rule 20 of W.c Rule 1966 Section U/s.166. Status: AWAIT SUMMONS. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUK020016782024

AWAIT SUMMONS

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

66/2024

Filing Date

04-07-2024

Registration No

263/2024

Registration Date

04-07-2024

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR

Judge

520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

Acts & Sections

U/s 22 of W.c Act 1923 R/w Rule 20 of W.c Rule 1966 Section U/s.166

Petitioner(s)

Yashodha W/o. Shekhar Harikantra

Adv. Prerana Manoj Naik

Respondent(s)

Suvidha Karapurkar

The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

15-05-2026

AWAIT SUMMONS

05-05-2026

AWAIT SUMMONS

17-04-2026

AWAIT SUMMONS

09-04-2026

AWAIT SUMMONS

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

07-02-2025
Issue
13-06-2025
Deposition
19-12-2025
Deposition
17-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 263/2024 Case: Yashodha W/o. Shekhar Harikantra vs. Suvidha Karapurkar and The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (MVC 263/24) Outcome: Case adjourned for continued hearing. Witnesses were examined on 17-01-2026; statements from injured party and vehicle owner/driver were recorded. One witness was partially treated as hostile, allowing cross-examination by opposing counsel. Petitioner's counsel was absent, and cross-examination was marked as not taken. Matter to be heard further before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Karwar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 263/2024 Case: Yashodha W/o. Shekhar Harikantra vs. Suvidha Karapurkar and The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (MVC 263/24) Outcome: Case adjourned for continued hearing. Witnesses were examined on 17-01-2026; statements from injured party and vehicle owner/driver were recorded. One witness was partially treated as hostile, allowing cross-examination by opposing counsel. Petitioner's counsel was absent, and cross-examination was marked as not taken. Matter to be heard further before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Karwar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case