Ravi S/o. Teku Gowda vs Ramashree Global Construction Pvt. Ltd. — 257/2024
Case under U/s 22 of W.c Act 1923 R/w Rule 20 of W.c Rule 1966 Section U/s.166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUK020016722024
Filing Number
64/2024
Filing Date
26-06-2024
Registration No
257/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravi S/o. Teku Gowda
Adv. Anuj A. Agranayak
Respondent(s)
Ramashree Global Construction Pvt. Ltd.
The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: M.V.C. 257/2024 The court partially allowed Ravi's compensation claim for injuries sustained in a January 19, 2024 road accident, awarding Rs. 4,35,000 with 6% annual interest instead of the claimed Rs. 15,00,000. The court found the lorry driver's rash and negligent driving caused the accident and held the vehicle owner and Bajaj Allianz General Insurance jointly and severally liable, though the petitioner failed to produce disability certificates or examine treating doctors to substantiate his injury claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M.V.C. 257/2024 The court partially allowed Ravi's compensation claim for injuries sustained in a January 19, 2024 road accident, awarding Rs. 4,35,000 with 6% annual interest instead of the claimed Rs. 15,00,000. The court found the lorry driver's rash and negligent driving caused the accident and held the vehicle owner and Bajaj Allianz General Insurance jointly and severally liable, though the petitioner failed to produce disability certificates or examine treating doctors to substantiate his injury claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts