Sri. Narayan Shivu Naik vs Sri. Santosh Madhukar Naik — 177/2024

Case under U/s 22 of W.c Act 1923 R/w Rule 20 of W.c Rule 1966 Section 166,232(1)(2). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 25th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUK020009022024

Case disposed

Filing Number

40/2024

Filing Date

08-05-2024

Registration No

177/2024

Registration Date

09-05-2024

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR

Judge

520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

Decision Date

25th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

U/s 22 of W.c Act 1923 R/w Rule 20 of W.c Rule 1966 Section 166,232(1)(2)

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Narayan Shivu Naik

Adv. PRADEEP BABU TANDEL

Respondent(s)

Sri. Santosh Madhukar Naik

The United India Insurance Company Ltd. Radha Govind Complex, Floor No.1 Kaikini Road, Karwar

Hearing History

Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR

25-04-2026

Disposed

24-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

17-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

09-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

02-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

25-04-2026
Judgment

Summary of Case 177/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the motor accident compensation petition, awarding Rs. 1,10,000 with 6% per annum interest instead of the claimed Rs. 10,00,000. The court found the tractor driver acted with rash and negligent driving causing the petitioner's grievous injuries (fracture and head wounds), making the vehicle owner and insurer jointly and severally liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

24-01-2025
Deposition
01-08-2025
Deposition
17-01-2025
Issue
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 177/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the motor accident compensation petition, awarding Rs. 1,10,000 with 6% per annum interest instead of the claimed Rs. 10,00,000. The court found the tractor driver acted with rash and negligent driving causing the petitioner's grievous injuries (fracture and head wounds), making the vehicle owner and insurer jointly and severally liable for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case