Deepak Kumar Shenvi, vs 1. Manager, Saraswat Co-op Bank — 13/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 107,406,409,415,420,463,464,465,468,470,471,477(o),120B,149. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
Summery case
CNR: KAUK020007692023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
13/2023
Filing Date
17-04-2023
Registration No
13/2023
Registration Date
17-04-2023
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Deepak Kumar Shenvi,
Adv. Sr. APP, Karwar
Respondent(s)
1. Manager, Saraswat Co-op Bank
2. Metachem Manufacturing Co-op Ltd.,
3. Directors
4. Jayant Pawar,
5. Dattareya Wadkar
6. Hasan Babayi
7. Tabrej Khan
8. Akbar Arabuyan
9. Shrinivas Padmavati Riyaltars Pvt. Ltd,
10. Shrinivas Sunkar
11. Madhukar Nekkanti
Hearing History
Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 29-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness examination record (B Summary No. 13/23) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Karwar, documenting testimony regarding a commercial dispute over cumin seed trading and alleged fraudulent transactions involving forged offer letters worth approximately 44 crores. The witness testified about unauthorized use of his company letterhead and requested action against the accused; the court admitted the witness statement and directed further investigation into the allegations of forgery and fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness examination record (B Summary No. 13/23) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Karwar, documenting testimony regarding a commercial dispute over cumin seed trading and alleged fraudulent transactions involving forged offer letters worth approximately 44 crores. The witness testified about unauthorized use of his company letterhead and requested action against the accused; the court admitted the witness statement and directed further investigation into the allegations of forgery and fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts