F.M. Ganapati so Laxman Manjrekar,(Legal Heir) vs Smt. Saraswati Gangadhar Kalgutkar, — 42/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule 1,151. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK020006992014
Filing Number
44/2014
Filing Date
09-09-2014
Registration No
42/2014
Registration Date
12-09-2014
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
F.M. Ganapati so Laxman Manjrekar,(Legal Heir)
Adv. A.M.S
F.M. Smt. Vishranti do. Datta Tamse
F.M. Nanda so. Narayana Revandikar,
F.M. Smt. Shashi Raghunath Aravekar
Respondent(s)
Smt. Saraswati Gangadhar Kalgutkar,
Sri. Venkatesh Ganapati Kalgutkar,
Sri. Ekanath Ganapati Kalgutkar
Shashikant Ganapati Kalgutkar
Mahendra Ganapati Kalgutkar
Ramesh Ganapati Kalgutkar
Smt. Mukta Ganapati Kalgutkar
Ramanath Gangddhar Kalgutkar since Deceased by his LR Smt. Shakuntala Ramanath Kalgutkar
Shivanant Gangadhar Kalgutkar,
Dwarakanath Gangddhar Kalgutkar,
Gurunath Gangddhar Kalgutkar
Smt. Sulochana Gangadhar Kalgutkar,
Smt. Maya Gangadhar Kalgutkar,
The State of Karnaaka, Represented by the Deputy Commissioner,
The Superintendent of Police,
Kiran S/o Ganapati Bhandari, Age-63 Years,
Smt. Radha Krishna Kalgutakar, Age-68 Years,
Shamu Pundalik kalgutkar, Age- 59 Years,
Hearing History
Judge: 594-ADDL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KARWAR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Karwar decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs, granting each plaintiff a 1/6th share in the ancestral joint family properties (excepting 8 guntas of acquired land in Sy.No.4/3). The court rejected the defendants' arguments that married daughters cannot claim inheritance rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, holding that succession to such properties is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, not the Land Reforms Act. The court also found no credible evidence of any prior partition between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Karwar decreed the partition suit in favor of the plaintiffs, granting each plaintiff a 1/6th share in the ancestral joint family properties (excepting 8 guntas of acquired land in Sy.No.4/3). The court rejected the defendants' arguments that married daughters cannot claim inheritance rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, holding that succession to such properties is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, not the Land Reforms Act. The court also found no credible evidence of any prior partition between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts