Sri. Rajesh So Devidas Naik,45yrs,Business,Ro Sumorama Apartment,Habbuwada,Karwar vs Sri. Parameshwar So Masti Naik,Major,Business,Ro Holanagadde,Kumta — 206/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Objection Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK020003582022

Filing Number

206/2022

Filing Date

08-Feb-2022

Registration No

206/2022

Registration Date

08-Feb-2022

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR

Judge

520-Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri. Rajesh So Devidas Naik,45yrs,Business,Ro Sumorama Apartment,Habbuwada,Karwar

    Adv. A.G.Nayak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri. Parameshwar So Masti Naik,Major,Business,Ro Holanagadde,Kumta

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Objection

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary This criminal case (CC No. 206/22) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Karwar, involved charges against 71-year-old Parmeswara Naik. The court found the accused's statement inconsistent and unreliable, noting discrepancies in documentary evidence (particularly regarding bank documents and cheques) and witness testimony. The accused was convicted and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 35,000 to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  15. 06-Oct-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  16. 23-Aug-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  18. 30-Jun-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  19. 25-Jun-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  20. 12-May-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  21. 24-Mar-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  22. 24-Feb-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  23. 28-Jan-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  24. 21-Jan-2025

    Restored

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  25. 21-Jan-2025

    NBW to Accused

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  26. 05-Mar-2022

    OrdersView PDF

  27. 05-Mar-2022

    Disposed

    Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar

  28. 17-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 08-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 206/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This criminal case (CC No. 206/22) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Karwar, involved charges against 71-year-old Parmeswara Naik. The court found the accused's statement inconsistent and unreliable, noting discrepancies in documentary evidence (particularly regarding bank documents and cheques) and witness testimony. The accused was convicted and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 35,000 to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case