Smt. Rajeshree W/o. Arun Raikar. vs Sri. Prabhakar Dattatray Raikar. — 5/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UnderOrder,VII,Rules,1and2,R/W,Section,26. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK020002892021
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
5/2021
Filing Date
04-03-2021
Registration No
5/2021
Registration Date
04-03-2021
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Rajeshree W/o. Arun Raikar.
Adv. SRI. S.Y.SHEJWADKAR
Sri. Ankit Arun Raikar
Adv. SRI. S.Y.SHEJWADKAR
Miss. Asmita D/o. Arun Raikar Rep.by next friend Smt. Rajeshree W/o.Arun Raikar.
Adv. SRI. S.Y.SHEJWADKAR
Respondent(s)
Sri. Prabhakar Dattatray Raikar.
Sri. Satish Prabhakar Raikar
Sri. Kishor Prabhakar Raikar.
Smt. Usha Vasant Shet D/o. Prabhakar Raikar.
Hearing History
Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Amendment
EVIDENCE
LOK-ADALATH
Concilliation
Concilliation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 14-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | LOK-ADALATH |
| 12-03-2026 | Concilliation |
| 06-03-2026 | Concilliation |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this civil case (Moo. Da. No. 5/21), the court examined witness testimony on 21-08-2024 and considered six documentary exhibits (CTS Nos. 12384, 442, 441, 440, 439, and 438). Based on the witness examination and documents, the plaintiff requested the court to pass an order as sought in the petition. The defendant's counsel was absent during proceedings, and the court adjourned the matter for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this civil case (Moo. Da. No. 5/21), the court examined witness testimony on 21-08-2024 and considered six documentary exhibits (CTS Nos. 12384, 442, 441, 440, 439, and 438). Based on the witness examination and documents, the plaintiff requested the court to pass an order as sought in the petition. The defendant's counsel was absent during proceedings, and the court adjourned the matter for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts