Smt. Kavita D/o. Pundlik Naik W/o. Babu Nailadi Rayarmane. vs Sri. Prashant S/o. Pundalik Naik — 1/2019
Case under Under Order Vii Rule 1 R/w Sec. 26 of Cpc. Status: ADDL.W/S. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK020000632019
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
1/2019
Filing Date
19-01-2019
Registration No
1/2019
Registration Date
24-01-2019
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Kavita D/o. Pundlik Naik W/o. Babu Nailadi Rayarmane.
Adv. SHANTA RAM NAIK
Respondent(s)
Sri. Prashant S/o. Pundalik Naik
Smt. Savita D/o. Pundlik Naik W/o. Pandurang Savant.
Sri. Shankar Damu Naik.
Sri. Vinod Devidas Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 520-PRL. SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR
ADDL.W/S
SUMMONS
Amendment
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ADDL.W/S |
| 27-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 23-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 21-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application (I.A. No.6) seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's suit for partition and cancellation of a sale deed. The court found that the defendants failed to establish grounds for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, holding that issues regarding cause of action, court fees, limitation, and necessary parties are matters for trial and cannot be resolved at the plaint stage. The suit is therefore permitted to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application (I.A. No.6) seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's suit for partition and cancellation of a sale deed. The court found that the defendants failed to establish grounds for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, holding that issues regarding cause of action, court fees, limitation, and necessary parties are matters for trial and cannot be resolved at the plaint stage. The suit is therefore permitted to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts