THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs Joran francis Barretto — 30/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,351(2),352. Status: FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAUK010018862025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
30/2025
Filing Date
29-12-2025
Registration No
30/2025
Registration Date
29-12-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
FIR Details
FIR Number
0060
Police Station
KARWAR TOWN PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Joran francis Barretto
Hearing History
Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
HBC/CHARGE / PLEA
CUSTODY MATTERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 15-04-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 13-03-2026 | HBC/CHARGE / PLEA |
| 21-02-2026 | CUSTODY MATTERS |
| 18-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.C.No.30/2025 Outcome: Bail petition rejected. Joran Francis Barretto's regular bail petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 was rejected by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar on February 21, 2026. The court found reasonable grounds to believe the accused committed murder (Section 103 BNS) and related offences (Sections 351(2) and 352 BNS), with 45 witnesses cited including 4 eyewitnesses. Given the grave nature of charges carrying potential death penalty or life imprisonment, and risks of witness intimidation or absconding, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.No.30/2025 Outcome: Bail petition rejected. Joran Francis Barretto's regular bail petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 was rejected by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar on February 21, 2026. The court found reasonable grounds to believe the accused committed murder (Section 103 BNS) and related offences (Sections 351(2) and 352 BNS), with 45 witnesses cited including 4 eyewitnesses. Given the grave nature of charges carrying potential death penalty or life imprisonment, and risks of witness intimidation or absconding, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts