Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank (Before amalgamation Varada Grameena Bank),Mundgod Branch. vs Smt. Indira W/o.Parashuram Lakmapur, — 37/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R.1R/w26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAUK010015582025

Filing Number

37/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

37/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

519-Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R.1R/w26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank (Before amalgamation Varada Grameena Bank),Mundgod Branch.

    Adv. PARAMESHWAR SHRIKRISHNA BHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Indira W/o.Parashuram Lakmapur,

  2. 2.Shri. Vasudev S/o.Parashuram Lakmapur,

  3. 3.Shri. Raghavendra S/o. Parashuram Lakmapur,

  4. 4.Shri. Shivaraj S/o. Parashuram Lakmapur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court closed the case as settled out of court after the petitioner bank's counsel filed a memo indicating the matter was resolved under the bank's OTS (One Time Settlement) Scheme, supported by a certificate confirming closure of the loan account. The court ordered refund of the permissible court fee to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court closed the case as settled out of court after the petitioner bank's counsel filed a memo indicating the matter was resolved under the bank's OTS (One Time Settlement) Scheme, supported by a certificate confirming closure of the loan account. The court ordered refund of the permissible court fee to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case