Kar. Vikas Grameena Bank (Before amalgamation Varada Grameena Bank),R/by Manager, P.A. Holder vs Shri Vasudev, S/o. Parashuram Lakmapur,Major, Occu-Business — 34/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.VIIR.1,R/w26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

Com.O.S. - COMMERCIAL ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAUK010015552025

Filing Number

34/2025

Filing Date

05-Nov-2025

Registration No

34/2025

Registration Date

05-Nov-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

519-Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O.VIIR.1,R/w26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kar. Vikas Grameena Bank (Before amalgamation Varada Grameena Bank),R/by Manager, P.A. Holder

    Adv. PARAMESHWAR SHRIKRISHNA BHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri Vasudev, S/o. Parashuram Lakmapur,Major, Occu-Business

  2. 2.Laxman, S/o. Ningappa Atanagi, Major, Occu-Head Master LPS Gvrt Primary School

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court closed the case as settled out of court after Kar. Vikas Grameena Bank's counsel filed a memo indicating the loan dispute was resolved under the bank's OTS (One-Time Settlement) scheme, supported by a loan account closure certificate. The court ordered refund of the permissible court fee to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court closed the case as settled out of court after Kar. Vikas Grameena Bank's counsel filed a memo indicating the loan dispute was resolved under the bank's OTS (One-Time Settlement) scheme, supported by a loan account closure certificate. The court ordered refund of the permissible court fee to the plaintiff bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case