THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs NITESH SURESH TANDEL — 19/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),249(a),238(a),61(2),115(2),103(1),3(5). Status: fixing date of trail. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAUK010014532025
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
14-10-2025
Filing Number
19/2025
Filing Date
14-10-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
NITESH SURESH TANDEL
NITYANAND BEERA HARIKANTRA
Adv. null
SURENDRA VINAYAK NAIK
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA
fixing date of trail
HBC/CHARGE / PLEA
HBC/CHARGE / PLEA
HBC/CHARGE / PLEA
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | fixing date of trail |
| 25-02-2026 | HBC/CHARGE / PLEA |
| 07-02-2026 | HBC/CHARGE / PLEA |
| 29-12-2025 | HBC/CHARGE / PLEA |
| 27-12-2025 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Application Allowed: The II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Uttara Kannada granted the application filed under Section 503 of BNSS by Samir Sitaram Naik for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Swift Car (GA-08/K-8363). The vehicle is released upon execution of an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with one surety, with conditions that the applicant cannot change the vehicle's colour/identity or sell it without court permission and must produce it whenever directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Application Allowed: The II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Uttara Kannada granted the application filed under Section 503 of BNSS by Samir Sitaram Naik for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki Swift Car (GA-08/K-8363). The vehicle is released upon execution of an Indemnity Bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with one surety, with conditions that the applicant cannot change the vehicle's colour/identity or sell it without court permission and must produce it whenever directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts