Mastamma W/o Somayya Naik vs Timmappa S/o Sannu Gonda — 7/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KAUK010014282025

Filing Number

7/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

1407-II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mastamma W/o Somayya Naik

    Adv. N. M. Naik, Bhatkal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Timmappa S/o Sannu Gonda

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    In MA 7/2025, the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Karwar disposed of the appeal filed by Mastamma W/o Somayya Naik against Timmappa S/o Sannu Gonda as "not pressed." The appellant's counsel filed a memo withdrawing the appeal while retaining liberty to initiate proceedings before the appropriate court. The appeal was accordingly disposed of without substantive adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In MA 7/2025, the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Karwar disposed of the appeal filed by Mastamma W/o Somayya Naik against Timmappa S/o Sannu Gonda as "not pressed." The appellant's counsel filed a memo withdrawing the appeal while retaining liberty to initiate proceedings before the appropriate court. The appeal was accordingly disposed of without substantive adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case