Shivappa S/o. Hulagappa Hosamani, R/o. At and post Nandwadgi village in Hungund Tq. Bagalkote Dist. vs The Management of N.W.K.R.T.C. U.K. Division Rep. by its Divisional Controller, Sirsi. — 4/2019
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Under Section Section 10-4(A). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
KID - Karnataka Industrical Dispute
CNR: KAUK010008172019
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
Filing Number
4/2019
Filing Date
03-06-2019
Registration No
4/2019
Registration Date
03-06-2019
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivappa S/o. Hulagappa Hosamani, R/o. At and post Nandwadgi village in Hungund Tq. Bagalkote Dist.
Adv. M.H.Bhat
Respondent(s)
The Management of N.W.K.R.T.C. U.K. Division Rep. by its Divisional Controller, Sirsi.
Hearing History
Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: KID 4/2019 The court order dated 31-03-2023 involved an inquiry against the petitioner, Shivappa, concerning alleged misconduct during departmental proceedings. The court found that the inquiry officer (respondent's representative) violated natural justice by failing to provide the petitioner adequate opportunity to give statements and explanations. The court also found evidence of collusion between the inquiry officer and the NWKRTC management in preparing false documents to assist the organization. The order directed that the inquiry proceedings be reopened in court for re-examination of witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: KID 4/2019 The court order dated 31-03-2023 involved an inquiry against the petitioner, Shivappa, concerning alleged misconduct during departmental proceedings. The court found that the inquiry officer (respondent's representative) violated natural justice by failing to provide the petitioner adequate opportunity to give statements and explanations. The court also found evidence of collusion between the inquiry officer and the NWKRTC management in preparing false documents to assist the organization. The order directed that the inquiry proceedings be reopened in court for re-examination of witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts