Sanjay Anand Nayak vs Rajesh Anand Nayak — 6/2023
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 276. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
P and SC - Probate and Succession Cases
CNR: KAUK010006602023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
6/2023
Filing Date
20-04-2023
Registration No
6/2023
Registration Date
21-04-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Anand Nayak
Adv. G.N.Jambawalikar
Vijay Anand Nayak
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Anand Nayak
Hearing History
Judge: 1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 29-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-12-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 6/2023 (Sanjay Anand Nayak and Vijay Anand Nayak v. Rajesh Anand Nayak): On 09-12-2025, the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court in Uttara Kannada, Karwar conducted witness examination (PW.2). The witness was sworn in and their testimony was recorded. During examination, the witness identified signatures on a will document (marked as Exhibit NIP-1 and NIP-1(a)) and authenticated another signature identified as Madhav Nayak's (marked as NIP-1(b)). No cross-examination was conducted as the opposing party was absent. The court recorded the witness statement through digital means. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 6/2023 (Sanjay Anand Nayak and Vijay Anand Nayak v. Rajesh Anand Nayak): On 09-12-2025, the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court in Uttara Kannada, Karwar conducted witness examination (PW.2). The witness was sworn in and their testimony was recorded. During examination, the witness identified signatures on a will document (marked as Exhibit NIP-1 and NIP-1(a)) and authenticated another signature identified as Madhav Nayak's (marked as NIP-1(b)). No cross-examination was conducted as the opposing party was absent. The court recorded the witness statement through digital means. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts