Sanjay Anand Nayak vs Rajesh Anand Nayak — 6/2023

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 276. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

P and SC - Probate and Succession Cases

CNR: KAUK010006602023

HEARING

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

6/2023

Filing Date

20-04-2023

Registration No

6/2023

Registration Date

21-04-2023

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 276

Petitioner(s)

Sanjay Anand Nayak

Adv. G.N.Jambawalikar

Vijay Anand Nayak

Respondent(s)

Rajesh Anand Nayak

Hearing History

Judge: 1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

25-03-2026

HEARING

17-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

29-01-2026

HEARING

09-12-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

19-04-2025
Deposition
09-12-2025
Deposition

Summary of Case 6/2023 (Sanjay Anand Nayak and Vijay Anand Nayak v. Rajesh Anand Nayak): On 09-12-2025, the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court in Uttara Kannada, Karwar conducted witness examination (PW.2). The witness was sworn in and their testimony was recorded. During examination, the witness identified signatures on a will document (marked as Exhibit NIP-1 and NIP-1(a)) and authenticated another signature identified as Madhav Nayak's (marked as NIP-1(b)). No cross-examination was conducted as the opposing party was absent. The court recorded the witness statement through digital means. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 6/2023 (Sanjay Anand Nayak and Vijay Anand Nayak v. Rajesh Anand Nayak): On 09-12-2025, the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court in Uttara Kannada, Karwar conducted witness examination (PW.2). The witness was sworn in and their testimony was recorded. During examination, the witness identified signatures on a will document (marked as Exhibit NIP-1 and NIP-1(a)) and authenticated another signature identified as Madhav Nayak's (marked as NIP-1(b)). No cross-examination was conducted as the opposing party was absent. The court recorded the witness statement through digital means. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case