Sri. Ananth Kalu Patagar vs Bhatkal Krushi and Grameena Abhiveradhi Sahakari B.Ltd. R/by Nagaraj Ram Gajanikar — 154/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: SETTELMENT. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAUK010005992025

SETTELMENT

Next Hearing

14th July 2026

Filing Number

154/2025

Filing Date

22-04-2025

Registration No

154/2025

Registration Date

22-04-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Ananth Kalu Patagar

Adv. VINAYAK NARAYAN NAIK

Respondent(s)

Bhatkal Krushi and Grameena Abhiveradhi Sahakari B.Ltd. R/by Nagaraj Ram Gajanikar

Hearing History

Judge: 1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

04-06-2026

SETTELMENT

13-03-2026

SETTELMENT

02-02-2026

SETTELMENT

13-12-2025

ARGUMENTS

10-12-2025

FOR LOKADALATH

Interim Orders

31-05-2025
Orders

Case Summary: CRL.A/154/2025 The court condoned a 255-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the appellant's explanation of ill health and inability to travel. The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for which he was sentenced to pay ₹1,92,800 fine or one year imprisonment. The court suspended the sentence for six months, subject to paying ₹10,000 within two weeks, depositing 20% compensation within two months, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹20,000 with surety before the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRL.A/154/2025 The court condoned a 255-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the appellant's explanation of ill health and inability to travel. The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for which he was sentenced to pay ₹1,92,800 fine or one year imprisonment. The court suspended the sentence for six months, subject to paying ₹10,000 within two weeks, depositing 20% compensation within two months, and furnishing a personal bond of ₹20,000 with surety before the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case