Darshan Dileep Moger vs The PSI Bhatkal — 110/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),312,352,115(2),118(1)M126(2),324(4),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUK010004422026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0059

Police Station

BHATKALA RURAL PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),312,352,115(2),118(1)M126(2),324(4),351(2),3(5)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Darshan Dileep Moger

Adv. Anamika M Rane

Respondent(s)

The PSI Bhatkal

Hearing History

Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR

24-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

ORDERS

17-03-2026

Objection

13-03-2026

Objection

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Orders

Case 110/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Darshan Dileep Moger, accused of threatening a hotel owner, attempting robbery, and assaulting a customer in March 2026. The judge found that the charges were not extreme offenses, the petitioner had already been interrogated, and co-accused persons were similarly granted bail, making bail appropriate under parity principles. The release was conditional on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, requiring regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, biweekly police station check-ins, and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 110/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Darshan Dileep Moger, accused of threatening a hotel owner, attempting robbery, and assaulting a customer in March 2026. The judge found that the charges were not extreme offenses, the petitioner had already been interrogated, and co-accused persons were similarly granted bail, making bail appropriate under parity principles. The release was conditional on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, requiring regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, biweekly police station check-ins, and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case