Darshan Dileep Moger vs The PSI Bhatkal — 110/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),312,352,115(2),118(1)M126(2),324(4),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010004422026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0059
Police Station
BHATKALA RURAL PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Darshan Dileep Moger
Adv. Anamika M Rane
Respondent(s)
The PSI Bhatkal
Hearing History
Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Disposed
ORDERS
Objection
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 17-03-2026 | Objection |
| 13-03-2026 | Objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 110/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Darshan Dileep Moger, accused of threatening a hotel owner, attempting robbery, and assaulting a customer in March 2026. The judge found that the charges were not extreme offenses, the petitioner had already been interrogated, and co-accused persons were similarly granted bail, making bail appropriate under parity principles. The release was conditional on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, requiring regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, biweekly police station check-ins, and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 110/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Darshan Dileep Moger, accused of threatening a hotel owner, attempting robbery, and assaulting a customer in March 2026. The judge found that the charges were not extreme offenses, the petitioner had already been interrogated, and co-accused persons were similarly granted bail, making bail appropriate under parity principles. The release was conditional on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, requiring regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, biweekly police station check-ins, and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts