Darshan Dileep Moger vs The PSI Bhatkal — 110/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),312,352,115(2),118(1)M126(2),324(4),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010004422026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0059
Police Station
BHATKALA RURAL PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Darshan Dileep Moger
Adv. Anamika M Rane
Respondent(s)
-
1.The PSI Bhatkal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 110/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Darshan Dileep Moger, accused of threatening a hotel owner, attempting robbery, and assaulting a customer in March 2026. The judge found that the charges were not extreme offenses, the petitioner had already been interrogated, and co-accused persons were similarly granted bail, making bail appropriate under parity principles. The release was conditional on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, requiring regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, biweekly police station check-ins, and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
17-Mar-2026
Objection
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2026
Case 110/2026 Summary The court granted bail to Darshan Dileep Moger, accused of threatening a hotel owner, attempting robbery, and assaulting a customer in March 2026. The judge found that the charges were not extreme offenses, the petitioner had already been interrogated, and co-accused persons were similarly granted bail, making bail appropriate under parity principles. The release was conditional on a ₹1,00,000 personal bond with surety, requiring regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, biweekly police station check-ins, and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts