Lokesh S/o. Raghuveer Mazali, R/o Harijana Colony, old fish market, Kumta. vs Ramadas Manjunath Shet, — 129/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAUK010004162026

Filing Number

124/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

519-Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lokesh S/o. Raghuveer Mazali, R/o Harijana Colony, old fish market, Kumta.

    Adv. Gajanan T Naik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramadas Manjunath Shet,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the parties' application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to compound the offence after the respondent confirmed receipt of Rs. 1,40,000 as full and final settlement. Consequently, the trial court's conviction judgment dated 10.07.2024 against the appellant under Section 138 NI Act was set aside and the appellant was acquitted. The jail authority was directed to release the appellant forthwith if not required in any other case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the parties' application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to compound the offence after the respondent confirmed receipt of Rs. 1,40,000 as full and final settlement. Consequently, the trial court's conviction judgment dated 10.07.2024 against the appellant under Section 138 NI Act was set aside and the appellant was acquitted. The jail authority was directed to release the appellant forthwith if not required in any other case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case