Masti Gonda alias Masti Narayan Gonda vs The Sub Inspector/Circle Police Inspector, Honnavar Police Station, — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),316(4),318(2),316(5),318(4),336(4), 336(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010003992026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
101/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0052
Police Station
HONNAVAR PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Masti Gonda alias Masti Narayan Gonda
Adv. Venkatesh Kuvalekar
Respondent(s)
The Sub Inspector/Circle Police Inspector, Honnavar Police Station,
Hearing History
Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
Call on
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 12-03-2026 | Call on |
| 07-03-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. No. 104/2026 Decision: The court rejected Masti Gonda's anticipatory bail petition. The judge found prima facie evidence that the petitioner, a Social Welfare Office employee, helped conspirators illegally acquire forest land by keeping fake GPS documents and sketches in official files, which involves grave non-bailable offences including one punishable with life imprisonment. Custodial interrogation was deemed necessary for fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. No. 104/2026 Decision: The court rejected Masti Gonda's anticipatory bail petition. The judge found prima facie evidence that the petitioner, a Social Welfare Office employee, helped conspirators illegally acquire forest land by keeping fake GPS documents and sketches in official files, which involves grave non-bailable offences including one punishable with life imprisonment. Custodial interrogation was deemed necessary for fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts