Suresh Nagappa Naik vs The Murudeshwar Police — 95/2026

Case under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act Section 3,4,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUK010003732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

95/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act Section 3,4,5
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 144(2)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Suresh Nagappa Naik

Adv. Gajanan T Naik

Respondent(s)

The Murudeshwar Police

Hearing History

Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDERS

09-03-2026

ORDERS

07-03-2026

Objection

06-03-2026

Objection

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar granted bail to Suresh Nagappa Naik, accused of human trafficking and immoral trafficking offenses under Sections 3, 4 & 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and Section 144(2) of BNS-2023. The court found that the offences are non-capital, the petitioner has already been interrogated, and he has permanent roots in society with no flight risk. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-tampering with witnesses, and biweekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar granted bail to Suresh Nagappa Naik, accused of human trafficking and immoral trafficking offenses under Sections 3, 4 & 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and Section 144(2) of BNS-2023. The court found that the offences are non-capital, the petitioner has already been interrogated, and he has permanent roots in society with no flight risk. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance, non-tampering with witnesses, and biweekly police reporting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case