Sri. Johnson Liyanv Pinto vs P S I / IO, HONNAVARA POLICE Station — 94/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010003692026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
94/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
94/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri. Johnson Liyanv Pinto
Adv. Maruti B Naik
Respondent(s)
-
1.P S I / IO (Investigating Officer), HONNAVARA POLICE Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Johnson Liyanv Pinto, accused in a motorcycle theft case (Crime No.258/2023) under Section 379 IPC. The judge held that since the charge sheet was already filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused was entitled to bail on parity grounds as co-accused was already granted bail. The court ordered his release on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
09-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
05-Mar-2026
Objection
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2026
The court allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Johnson Liyanv Pinto, accused in a motorcycle theft case (Crime No.258/2023) under Section 379 IPC. The judge held that since the charge sheet was already filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused was entitled to bail on parity grounds as co-accused was already granted bail. The court ordered his release on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts