Sri. Johnson Liyanv Pinto vs P S I / IO, HONNAVARA POLICE Station — 94/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010003692026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
94/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
94/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Johnson Liyanv Pinto
Adv. Maruti B Naik
Respondent(s)
P S I / IO (Investigating Officer), HONNAVARA POLICE Station
Hearing History
Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
Objection
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 05-03-2026 | Objection |
| 03-03-2026 | Objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Johnson Liyanv Pinto, accused in a motorcycle theft case (Crime No.258/2023) under Section 379 IPC. The judge held that since the charge sheet was already filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused was entitled to bail on parity grounds as co-accused was already granted bail. The court ordered his release on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Johnson Liyanv Pinto, accused in a motorcycle theft case (Crime No.258/2023) under Section 379 IPC. The judge held that since the charge sheet was already filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused was entitled to bail on parity grounds as co-accused was already granted bail. The court ordered his release on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts