Sri. Prabhakar Rama Naik vs The P S I /IO , BHATKAL RURAL POLICE STATION — 92/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74 , 126(2),115(2),352. 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010003672026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
92/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Prabhakar Rama Naik
Adv. Maruti B Naik
Sri. Devendra Narayan Bakkada alias Naik
Adv. Maruti B Naik
Respondent(s)
The P S I /IO , BHATKAL RURAL POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
HEARING
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 03-03-2026 | Objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by two petitioners under Section 482 BNSS for offences including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found that the charges were not punishable with death or life imprisonment, the petitioners had strong community ties, and conditions could safeguard against witness tampering or absconding. The court ordered their release on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with one surety, subject to cooperation with investigation and bi-weekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karwar, allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by two petitioners under Section 482 BNSS for offences including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt. The court found that the charges were not punishable with death or life imprisonment, the petitioners had strong community ties, and conditions could safeguard against witness tampering or absconding. The court ordered their release on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with one surety, subject to cooperation with investigation and bi-weekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts