Nataraj Bhimappa Hosuru vs Banavasi Police. By The Inspector of Police , Banavasi Police Station — 89/2026
Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act Section (U/s-3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(v-a). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010003472026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
89/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
89/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nataraj Bhimappa Hosuru
Adv. Gajanan T Naik
Praveen Ramapur
Adv. Hema Gouda
Imran Aliyas Mandakki
Adv. Hema Gouda
Respondent(s)
Banavasi Police. By The Inspector of Police , Banavasi Police Station
Parasappa Puttappa Lamani
Dasharatharaja Bhudihal
Hearing History
Judge: 1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 05-03-2026 | Objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections for allegedly abusing and obstructing a Scheduled Caste employee during banner removal. The court found no prima facie case against them, noting the complaint lacked sufficient ingredients and that even the victim and complainant did not object to bail. Anticipatory bail was allowed on conditions including execution of a Rs. 50,000 bail bond each, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections for allegedly abusing and obstructing a Scheduled Caste employee during banner removal. The court found no prima facie case against them, noting the complaint lacked sufficient ingredients and that even the victim and complainant did not object to bail. Anticipatory bail was allowed on conditions including execution of a Rs. 50,000 bail bond each, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts