Nataraj Bhimappa Hosuru vs Banavasi Police. By The Inspector of Police , Banavasi Police Station — 89/2026

Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act Section (U/s-3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(v-a). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUK010003472026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

89/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

1407-II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act Section (U/s-3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(v-a)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,3(5),351,352
Karnataka Open Places Prevention of Disfigurement Act 1981 Section 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nataraj Bhimappa Hosuru

    Adv. Gajanan T Naik

  2. 2.Praveen Ramapur

    Adv. Hema Gouda

  3. 3.Imran Aliyas Mandakki

    Adv. Hema Gouda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Banavasi Police. By The Inspector of Police , Banavasi Police Station

  2. 2.Parasappa Puttappa Lamani

  3. 3.Dasharatharaja Bhudihal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections for allegedly abusing and obstructing a Scheduled Caste employee during banner removal. The court found no prima facie case against them, noting the complaint lacked sufficient ingredients and that even the victim and complainant did not object to bail. Anticipatory bail was allowed on conditions including execution of a Rs. 50,000 bail bond each, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Objection

    II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections for allegedly abusing and obstructing a Scheduled Caste employee during banner removal. The court found no prima facie case against them, noting the complaint lacked sufficient ingredients and that even the victim and complainant did not object to bail. Anticipatory bail was allowed on conditions including execution of a Rs. 50,000 bail bond each, cooperation with investigation, and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case