Deepak Radhkrishna Sagekar vs The PSI Karwar Town Police Station, — 85/2026

Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 15(A), 32(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUK010003342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

85/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Excise Act Section 15(A), 32(3)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Deepak Radhkrishna Sagekar

Adv. Divya Kadam

Respondent(s)

The PSI Karwar Town Police Station,

Hearing History

Judge: 519-PRL. DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE, COURT U.K, KARWAR

06-03-2026

Disposed

04-03-2026

ORDERS

02-03-2026

ORDERS

27-02-2026

Objection

25-02-2026

Objection

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Karwar allowed anticipatory bail for Deepak S/o Radhakrishna Sagekar in Crime No. 82/2025 under the Karnataka Excise Act (Sections 15(A) & 32(3)). The court found that since the offences are not capital offences, liquor was already recovered, and the charge sheet was filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court applied the principle that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, and granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Karwar allowed anticipatory bail for Deepak S/o Radhakrishna Sagekar in Crime No. 82/2025 under the Karnataka Excise Act (Sections 15(A) & 32(3)). The court found that since the offences are not capital offences, liquor was already recovered, and the charge sheet was filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court applied the principle that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, and granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case