Deepak Radhkrishna Sagekar vs The PSI Karwar Town Police Station, — 85/2026
Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 15(A), 32(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK010003342026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
85/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
519-Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deepak Radhkrishna Sagekar
Adv. Divya Kadam
Respondent(s)
-
1.The PSI Karwar Town Police Station,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Karwar allowed anticipatory bail for Deepak S/o Radhakrishna Sagekar in Crime No. 82/2025 under the Karnataka Excise Act (Sections 15(A) & 32(3)). The court found that since the offences are not capital offences, liquor was already recovered, and the charge sheet was filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court applied the principle that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, and granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
04-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
02-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
27-Feb-2026
Objection
Prl. District Sessions Judge, Court U.k, Karwar
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 85/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Karwar allowed anticipatory bail for Deepak S/o Radhakrishna Sagekar in Crime No. 82/2025 under the Karnataka Excise Act (Sections 15(A) & 32(3)). The court found that since the offences are not capital offences, liquor was already recovered, and the charge sheet was filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court applied the principle that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, and granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts