Mayor S/o. Dattaram Anvekar vs Godavari Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamita, R/by Manager Vinayak Purshottam Bandekar — 69/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAUK010003152025

Case disposed

Filing Number

69/2025

Filing Date

27-02-2025

Registration No

69/2025

Registration Date

27-02-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Mayor S/o. Dattaram Anvekar

Adv. R.L. PARULEKAR

Respondent(s)

Godavari Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamita, R/by Manager Vinayak Purshottam Bandekar

Hearing History

Judge: 1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SETTELMENT

04-03-2026

NOTICE

17-02-2026

NOTICE

10-02-2026

SETTELMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok-Adalath at Karwar disposed of the appeal as settled out of court between Mayor Anvekar and Godavari Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamita. The court set aside the conviction and sentence from the trial court (CC No.1671/2024 dated 28.01.2025) for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted the accused. The appellant was permitted to withdraw the deposited amount as per the joint settlement petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

28-02-2025
Orders
casestatus.in Summary

The Lok-Adalath at Karwar disposed of the appeal as settled out of court between Mayor Anvekar and Godavari Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamita. The court set aside the conviction and sentence from the trial court (CC No.1671/2024 dated 28.01.2025) for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted the accused. The appellant was permitted to withdraw the deposited amount as per the joint settlement petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case