Rajesh Govind Tandel vs The State of Karnatak, Rep. By PP Karwar, U.K. — 7/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 13th March 2026.
CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS
CNR: KAUK010002642025
Filing Number
7/2025
Filing Date
15-Feb-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
15-Feb-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR
Judge
1407-II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajesh Govind Tandel
Adv. PRADEEP BABU TANDEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Karnatak, Rep. By PP (Public Prosecutor) Karwar, U.K.
-
2.The Taluk Executive Magistrate, Honnavar, U.K.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
The court disposed of Rajesh Govind Tandel's petition as infructuous, finding that the one-year period specified in the Executive Magistrate's order (dated 05-02-2025) requiring him to execute an indemnity bond to maintain peace had already expired, rendering the petition no longer maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
12-Jan-2026
Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
24-Sep-2025
Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
27-May-2025
Awaiting Records
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
25-Feb-2025
Tcr
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
24-Feb-2025
Call on
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
20-Feb-2025
Notice
II Addl. District And Sessions Judgeuttara Kannada
-
17-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2025
The court disposed of Rajesh Govind Tandel's petition as infructuous, finding that the one-year period specified in the Executive Magistrate's order (dated 05-02-2025) requiring him to execute an indemnity bond to maintain peace had already expired, rendering the petition no longer maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts