Ramesh Mastayya Naik vs The Janata Co-op Credit Society Ltd,Bhatkal, R/by Manager Nagesh Madev Devadiga — 45/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAUK010002302025

Case disposed

Filing Number

45/2025

Filing Date

10-02-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

10-02-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR

Judge

1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Ramesh Mastayya Naik

Adv. KRISHNA NARAYANA NAIK

Respondent(s)

The Janata Co-op Credit Society Ltd,Bhatkal, R/by Manager Nagesh Madev Devadiga

Hearing History

Judge: 1407-II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGEUTTARA KANNADA

13-03-2026

Disposed

31-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

29-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

20-12-2025

JUDGEMENT

15-12-2025

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 45/2025 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ramesh Mastayya Naik's appeal and confirmed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The court found that Naik borrowed ₹50,000 from Janata Co-operative Credit Society, issued cheque No. 791151 for ₹51,700 toward loan repayment, which bounced for insufficient funds, and failed to pay despite receiving legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

11-02-2025
Orders
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 45/2025 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ramesh Mastayya Naik's appeal and confirmed his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque. The court found that Naik borrowed ₹50,000 from Janata Co-operative Credit Society, issued cheque No. 791151 for ₹51,700 toward loan repayment, which bounced for insufficient funds, and failed to pay despite receiving legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case