MAGADI PS vs Nandisha — 4045/2025

Case under Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 87. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY/ PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN420049922025

e-Filing Number

14-08-2025

Filing Number

4045/2025

Filing Date

14-Aug-2025

Registration No

4045/2025

Registration Date

14-Aug-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

103-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY/ PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0169

Police Station

MAGADI PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAGADI PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nandisha

  2. 2.Chiranjeevi

  3. 3.Anjanappa

  4. 4.Rudresha

  5. 5.Krupashankara

  6. 6.Kemparaju

  7. 7.Prakash

  8. 8.Ravi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Accused No.6 was convicted under Section 87 of the KP Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.300/- with one month simple imprisonment as default. The court forfeited Rs.3,350/- seized from the accused to government and ordered destruction of two other items after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 30-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 08-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4045/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Accused No.6 was convicted under Section 87 of the KP Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.300/- with one month simple imprisonment as default. The court forfeited Rs.3,350/- seized from the accused to government and ordered destruction of two other items after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case