State by Magadi Police vs Srujan Gowda J Advocate - L.GopalGowda — 3372/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,498(A),R/W,Sec,34,of,IPC. Status: EVIDENCE.. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN420036092022

EVIDENCE.

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2022

Filing Number

3366/2022

Filing Date

06-04-2022

Registration No

3372/2022

Registration Date

06-04-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

103-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

FIR Details

FIR Number

0220

Police Station

MAGADI PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 504,498(A),R/W,Sec,34,of,IPC
U/S Section 3,4,of,D.P.ACT

Petitioner(s)

State by Magadi Police

Adv. no

Respondent(s)

Srujan Gowda J Advocate - L.GopalGowda

Jayshankar

Adv. L.GopalGowda

MGN Latha

Adv. L.GopalGowda

Hearing History

Judge: 103-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

30-04-2026

EVIDENCE.

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE.

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE.

29-12-2025

EVIDENCE.

07-11-2025

EVIDENCE.

Interim Orders

05-08-2023
Orders
12-01-2024
Deposition
19-04-2024
Deposition
23-05-2024
Deposition
28-06-2024
Deposition
01-08-2024
Deposition
12-09-2024
Deposition
23-12-2024
Deposition
01-02-2025
Deposition
28-02-2026
Deposition

Summary of Case 3372/2022 In this criminal case heard at Magadi JMFC on 28.02.2026, a witness was examined regarding charges under Sections 10/12 IPC. The prosecution's witness testified but provided largely inconsistent and evasive responses, claiming lack of knowledge about key facts including the identities of accused persons, details of alleged disputes, and circumstances of the alleged incident. The prosecution sought to treat the witness as hostile and was permitted cross-examination. However, the witness's testimony remained largely unhelpful to the prosecution's case. The court noted no further hearing was required, and the accused's counsel indicated no cross-examination was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 3372/2022 In this criminal case heard at Magadi JMFC on 28.02.2026, a witness was examined regarding charges under Sections 10/12 IPC. The prosecution's witness testified but provided largely inconsistent and evasive responses, claiming lack of knowledge about key facts including the identities of accused persons, details of alleged disputes, and circumstances of the alleged incident. The prosecution sought to treat the witness as hostile and was permitted cross-examination. However, the witness's testimony remained largely unhelpful to the prosecution's case. The court noted no further hearing was required, and the accused's counsel indicated no cross-examination was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case