S Rathnamma vs Huchahanumegowda — 209/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC. Status: For Clarification. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

For Clarification Next hearing 04-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN420034182024

Filing Number

209/2024

Filing Date

15-Jun-2024

Registration No

209/2024

Registration Date

15-Jun-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

1037-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1OFCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S Rathnamma

    Adv. S THEJASWINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Huchahanumegowda

  2. 2.Jayamma

  3. 3.Byraiah

  4. 4.Chandrashekar

  5. 5.Nagarathna

  6. 6.Krishnappa

  7. 7.Nagaraju

  8. 8.Hanumanthaiah

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    For Clarification

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    For Clarification

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    For Clarification

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 18-Oct-2025

    Judgments

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Arguments.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    Arguments.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 09-Sep-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 209/2024 Summary: The court rejected S Rathnamma's application for temporary injunction against Huchahanumegowda, Jayamma, and others. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from interfering with her alleged possession of six suit schedule properties in Magadi, claiming absolute ownership through registered sale deeds and prior litigation. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, particularly regarding two of the six properties for which no documentation was produced. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court declined to consider balance of convenience and irreparable loss arguments, thereby rejecting the injunction application with no costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 09-Sep-2025

    Arguments.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 06-Sep-2025

    Orders.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Orders.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 05-Aug-2025

    Orders.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence.

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 25-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 27-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 11-Nov-2024

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 09-Nov-2024

    Await Notice

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 30-Oct-2024

    Await Notice

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 30-Sep-2024

    Await Notice

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 31-Aug-2024

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 03-Aug-2024

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 01-Jul-2024

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 18-Jun-2024

    Notice

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 15-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 15-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 209/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 209/2024 Summary: The court rejected S Rathnamma's application for temporary injunction against Huchahanumegowda, Jayamma, and others. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from interfering with her alleged possession of six suit schedule properties in Magadi, claiming absolute ownership through registered sale deeds and prior litigation. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, particularly regarding two of the six properties for which no documentation was produced. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court declined to consider balance of convenience and irreparable loss arguments, thereby rejecting the injunction application with no costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case