MAGADI PS vs Nagamma Aliace Nagi — 2281/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN420029492025

e-Filing Number

21-06-2025

Filing Number

2281/2025

Filing Date

21-Jun-2025

Registration No

2281/2025

Registration Date

21-Jun-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

103-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0046

Police Station

MAGADI PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAGADI PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagamma Aliace Nagi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 2281/2025 Summary The court allowed a compromise petition filed under Section 359 of BNSS by complainant Puttatayamma, who stated she had compounded the matter and wished to live amicably with the accused. The accused was acquitted of charges under Section 303(2) of BNS (a compoundable offense), and interim custody of golden ornaments was made absolute in favor of the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 31-Dec-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 06-Sep-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 10-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 23-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2281/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2281/2025 Summary The court allowed a compromise petition filed under Section 359 of BNSS by complainant Puttatayamma, who stated she had compounded the matter and wished to live amicably with the accused. The accused was acquitted of charges under Section 303(2) of BNS (a compoundable offense), and interim custody of golden ornaments was made absolute in favor of the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case