State by Magadi Police vs Narasegowda Advocate - NARASIMHAMURTHY V.L — 1966/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506IPC. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 05-Jun-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KARN420024522023

e-Filing Number

17-06-2023

Filing Number

1966/2023

Filing Date

17-Jun-2023

Registration No

1966/2023

Registration Date

17-Jun-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

103-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0029

Police Station

MAGADI PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State by Magadi Police

    Adv. no

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narasegowda Advocate - NARASIMHAMURTHY V.L

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 20-Dec-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 16-Aug-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 10-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case 1966/2023 On 10.07.2025, the Primary Judge at Magadi Court conducted witness examination in this criminal case. The witness (Renuka Prasad, age 26) testified regarding a February 17, 2023 incident involving a helmet. During examination-in-chief by the state prosecutor, the witness identified documentary evidence (Exhibit NP-2 and NP-3) and confirmed details about the alleged offense. Defense counsel (V.L. Narasimhamurthy) conducted cross-examination, challenging the witness's credibility by suggesting fabricated evidence and false statements. The court found the witness partially adverse and permitted cross-examination. No further adjournment was recorded; the case proceeded on its hearing date with witness examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 04-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 16-May-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 16-Mar-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 05-Jan-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 02-Dec-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 02-Dec-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 23-Sep-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 23-Sep-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 02-Sep-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 24-Aug-2023

    ChargeView PDF

  33. 24-Aug-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 11-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 17-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1966/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1966/2023 On 10.07.2025, the Primary Judge at Magadi Court conducted witness examination in this criminal case. The witness (Renuka Prasad, age 26) testified regarding a February 17, 2023 incident involving a helmet. During examination-in-chief by the state prosecutor, the witness identified documentary evidence (Exhibit NP-2 and NP-3) and confirmed details about the alleged offense. Defense counsel (V.L. Narasimhamurthy) conducted cross-examination, challenging the witness's credibility by suggesting fabricated evidence and false statements. The court found the witness partially adverse and permitted cross-examination. No further adjournment was recorded; the case proceeded on its hearing date with witness examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case