MOHAMMED SAMI ULLA vs THE CHIEF REGISTRE OF BIRTH AND DEATH — 59/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13{3}. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN420003422026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
59/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI
Judge
887-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED SAMI ULLA
Adv. BASAVARAJU D S
Respondent(s)
THE CHIEF REGISTRE OF BIRTH AND DEATH
Hearing History
Judge: 887-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
CALL ON LOK ADALTH
FIRST HEARING
FIRST HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | CALL ON LOK ADALTH |
| 09-03-2026 | FIRST HEARING |
| 04-03-2026 | FIRST HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 59/2026 The National Lok Adalath allowed Mohammed Sami Ulla's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Chief Registrar to enter his date of birth as 20-07-1979 in the official register. The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties after verifying the petitioner's supporting documents, noting that only the fact of birth matters, not the correctness of the date, in such proceedings. However, the court clarified this entry shall not be conclusive proof and is limited to producing before the registrar's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 59/2026 The National Lok Adalath allowed Mohammed Sami Ulla's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Chief Registrar to enter his date of birth as 20-07-1979 in the official register. The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties after verifying the petitioner's supporting documents, noting that only the fact of birth matters, not the correctness of the date, in such proceedings. However, the court clarified this entry shall not be conclusive proof and is limited to producing before the registrar's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts