MOHAMMED SAMI ULLA vs THE CHIEF REGISTRE OF BIRTH AND DEATH — 59/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13{3}. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN420003422026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

59/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

887-Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13{3}

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED SAMI ULLA

    Adv. BASAVARAJU D S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CHIEF REGISTRE OF BIRTH AND DEATH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 59/2026 The National Lok Adalath allowed Mohammed Sami Ulla's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Chief Registrar to enter his date of birth as 20-07-1979 in the official register. The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties after verifying the petitioner's supporting documents, noting that only the fact of birth matters, not the correctness of the date, in such proceedings. However, the court clarified this entry shall not be conclusive proof and is limited to producing before the registrar's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Call On Lok Adalth

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 59/2026 The National Lok Adalath allowed Mohammed Sami Ulla's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Chief Registrar to enter his date of birth as 20-07-1979 in the official register. The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties after verifying the petitioner's supporting documents, noting that only the fact of birth matters, not the correctness of the date, in such proceedings. However, the court clarified this entry shall not be conclusive proof and is limited to producing before the registrar's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case