Naseer Pasha vs The chief registrar of birth and death — 54/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/Sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN420003112026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

53/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

103-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

MAGADI PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/Sec.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naseer Pasha

    Adv. RAVI T M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The chief registrar of birth and death

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.Mis. 54/2026 The National Lok-Adalath allowed Naseer Pasha's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Chief Registrar to register his date of birth as 05.06.1984. The court accepted the petitioner's satisfactory documentary evidence and the parties' joint compromise memorandum. The registration is limited to administrative purposes and is not conclusive proof if disputed in criminal litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Mis. 54/2026 The National Lok-Adalath allowed Naseer Pasha's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Chief Registrar to register his date of birth as 05.06.1984. The court accepted the petitioner's satisfactory documentary evidence and the parties' joint compromise memorandum. The registration is limited to administrative purposes and is not conclusive proof if disputed in criminal litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case