Rasheeda Bi vs The chief registrar of birth and death — 56/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/Sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN420003102026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

52/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

103-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

MAGADI PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/Sec.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rasheeda Bi

    Adv. RAVI T M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The chief registrar of birth and death

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 56/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed Rasheeda Bi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, based on a joint settlement between petitioner and respondent. The court directed the Chief Registrar to enter her date of birth as 08.06.1968 in the register after verifying her supporting documents. However, this entry is non-conclusive and not valid for purposes beyond birth registration, remaining subject to dispute in criminal or civil litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Call On Lok Adalth

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 56/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 56/2026 Summary: The National Lok-Adalath allowed Rasheeda Bi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, based on a joint settlement between petitioner and respondent. The court directed the Chief Registrar to enter her date of birth as 08.06.1968 in the register after verifying her supporting documents. However, this entry is non-conclusive and not valid for purposes beyond birth registration, remaining subject to dispute in criminal or civil litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case