Padma vs Tahasildar — 34/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN420001552026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
34/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI
Judge
103-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Padma
Adv. SANGEETHA K
Respondent(s)
Tahasildar
Hearing History
Judge: 103-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
CALL ON LOK ADALTH
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | CALL ON LOK ADALTH |
| 11-02-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 34/2026 The National Lok-Adalath allowed Padma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 to register her date of birth as 13.02.1975. After both parties filed a joint memo and Padma produced satisfactory original documents, the Tahasildar (respondent) was directed to enter this date in the birth register. The court clarified that this entry is not conclusive proof and can be disputed in criminal proceedings or litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 34/2026 The National Lok-Adalath allowed Padma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 to register her date of birth as 13.02.1975. After both parties filed a joint memo and Padma produced satisfactory original documents, the Tahasildar (respondent) was directed to enter this date in the birth register. The court clarified that this entry is not conclusive proof and can be disputed in criminal proceedings or litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts