Padma vs Tahasildar — 34/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KARN420001552026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

103-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Padma

    Adv. SANGEETHA K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tahasildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 34/2026 The National Lok-Adalath allowed Padma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 to register her date of birth as 13.02.1975. After both parties filed a joint memo and Padma produced satisfactory original documents, the Tahasildar (respondent) was directed to enter this date in the birth register. The court clarified that this entry is not conclusive proof and can be disputed in criminal proceedings or litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Call On Lok Adalth

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 34/2026 The National Lok-Adalath allowed Padma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 to register her date of birth as 13.02.1975. After both parties filed a joint memo and Padma produced satisfactory original documents, the Tahasildar (respondent) was directed to enter this date in the birth register. The court clarified that this entry is not conclusive proof and can be disputed in criminal proceedings or litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case