Bhagyamma K vs Channamma H — 756/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1and2. Status: TO CALL ON. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN410010632025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
756/2025
Filing Date
25-10-2025
Registration No
756/2025
Registration Date
25-10-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI
Judge
1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagyamma K
Adv. GANESH.N
Respondent(s)
Channamma H
Hearing History
Judge: 1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
TO CALL ON
ORDERS
TO HEAR ON
TO HEAR ON
TO HEAR ON
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | TO CALL ON |
| 24-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 23-04-2026 | TO HEAR ON |
| 15-04-2026 | TO HEAR ON |
| 06-04-2026 | TO HEAR ON |
Interim Orders
Case 756/2025 Summary Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Bhagyamma K sought a temporary injunction restraining Channamma H from alienating a property during pending litigation over a property sale agreement. Bhagyamma claimed she paid Rs. 4,00,000 advance against a total sale price of Rs. 13,50,000 under an agreement dated 19.07.2024, but Channamma refused to execute the final deed. Channamma denied agreeing to sell, claiming the agreement was fraudulently created using her blank signature obtained when her husband borrowed money. The court found the agreement was written on an insufficiently stamped Rs. 15 stamp paper, making it inadmissible under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court rejected the injunction application on 25 April 2026, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 756/2025 Summary Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Bhagyamma K sought a temporary injunction restraining Channamma H from alienating a property during pending litigation over a property sale agreement. Bhagyamma claimed she paid Rs. 4,00,000 advance against a total sale price of Rs. 13,50,000 under an agreement dated 19.07.2024, but Channamma refused to execute the final deed. Channamma denied agreeing to sell, claiming the agreement was fraudulently created using her blank signature obtained when her husband borrowed money. The court found the agreement was written on an insufficiently stamped Rs. 15 stamp paper, making it inadmissible under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court rejected the injunction application on 25 April 2026, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts