Bhagyamma K vs Channamma H — 756/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1and2. Status: TO CALL ON. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN410010632025

TO CALL ON

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

756/2025

Filing Date

25-10-2025

Registration No

756/2025

Registration Date

25-10-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Bhagyamma K

Adv. GANESH.N

Respondent(s)

Channamma H

Hearing History

Judge: 1253-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

25-04-2026

TO CALL ON

24-04-2026

ORDERS

23-04-2026

TO HEAR ON

15-04-2026

TO HEAR ON

06-04-2026

TO HEAR ON

Interim Orders

25-04-2026
Orders

Case 756/2025 Summary Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Bhagyamma K sought a temporary injunction restraining Channamma H from alienating a property during pending litigation over a property sale agreement. Bhagyamma claimed she paid Rs. 4,00,000 advance against a total sale price of Rs. 13,50,000 under an agreement dated 19.07.2024, but Channamma refused to execute the final deed. Channamma denied agreeing to sell, claiming the agreement was fraudulently created using her blank signature obtained when her husband borrowed money. The court found the agreement was written on an insufficiently stamped Rs. 15 stamp paper, making it inadmissible under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court rejected the injunction application on 25 April 2026, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 756/2025 Summary Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. Bhagyamma K sought a temporary injunction restraining Channamma H from alienating a property during pending litigation over a property sale agreement. Bhagyamma claimed she paid Rs. 4,00,000 advance against a total sale price of Rs. 13,50,000 under an agreement dated 19.07.2024, but Channamma refused to execute the final deed. Channamma denied agreeing to sell, claiming the agreement was fraudulently created using her blank signature obtained when her husband borrowed money. The court found the agreement was written on an insufficiently stamped Rs. 15 stamp paper, making it inadmissible under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Without establishing a prima facie case, the court rejected the injunction application on 25 April 2026, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case