H.T Nagesh vs Munimaramma — 399/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Us. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KARN410005702020
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
Filing Number
399/2020
Filing Date
16-12-2020
Registration No
399/2020
Registration Date
16-12-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI
Judge
1029-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
H.T Nagesh
Adv. Prabhakar P.M
Respondent(s)
Munimaramma
Channappa
Munirathna
Naveen Kumar
Praveen Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1029-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
In OS 399/2020, on 17.11.2025, the court heard arguments from both sides regarding a property dispute between petitioner H.T Nagesh and respondents Munimaramma, Channappa, and Munirathna. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence including property genealogy records, tax receipts, and address documentation. The case was adjourned for continued arguments on the merits, with the court noting discrepancies in the respondents' addresses and examining claims regarding property ownership and family relationships. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In OS 399/2020, on 17.11.2025, the court heard arguments from both sides regarding a property dispute between petitioner H.T Nagesh and respondents Munimaramma, Channappa, and Munirathna. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence including property genealogy records, tax receipts, and address documentation. The case was adjourned for continued arguments on the merits, with the court noting discrepancies in the respondents' addresses and examining claims regarding property ownership and family relationships. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts